Bot traffic: technology.wholereach.com

all sites · all domains · last 15 days

All sites · All Domains · Visit technology.wholereach.com

Who is really visiting technology.wholereach.com?

Between Oct 23 and Nov 6, technology.wholereach.com received 2,976 requests. About 98% came from automated software and about 0.7% look like real people.

That works out to about 9 human visitors, roughly fewer than 1 a day, who opened 11 pages between them. 2 of them read more than one page.

The biggest source is bots that say who they are. Most of those are normal and some, like search engines, help people find the site.

Bottom line: the hit counts on the All Domains worksheet are almost entirely bots. Use the human visitor figure here to judge this site's real audience.

98%of requests from bots
9human visitors (estimate)
11pages opened by people
2,976total requests, 15 days

Where the requests came from

People 0.7%Named bots 47%Disguised bots 30%Scanners 21%Unclear 1.2%

Requests per day

PeopleNamed botsDisguised botsScannersUnclear
0100200300400Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

Human visitors per day

Same days, people only, on their own scale so they are visible.

01234Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

The breakdown

SourceRequestsΣ 2,976ShareData sentBlockedby the serverWhat this means
Disguised scrapers87429%21 MB3Claims to be a normal browser but only downloads pages, never the images or icons a real browser fetches, reads many pages without ever clicking a link, or runs from a cloud provider.
Search engines64322%14 MB0Crawlers that say who they are, such as Google, Bing, Apple and Amazon. Usually welcome: this is how people find the site.
Break-in scanners38313%2 MB7Probing for WordPress logins, password files and other common weak spots.
AI crawlers35112%5 MB0AI companies gathering pages or answering a user's question, and saying so.
Other named bots30410%6 MB3Any other software that identifies itself as a bot.
Scanners posing as browsers2448.2%4 MB0Other requests from an address also caught probing for weak spots.
SEO and marketing tools1123.8%2 MB13Commercial tools that sell data about websites.
Unclear361.2%<1 MB0Browser name, but fetched only an image or data file and no page. Could be either.
Likely people180.6%<1 MB0Opened a page and also fetched its images or icons, at a human pace, from a non-cloud address.
Scripts and tools90.3%<1 MB0Programs such as curl or Python, or anything with an unrecognizable name.
Possibly people20.1%<1 MB0Read 1 to 3 pages, arrived from a search engine or social link, no icons fetched. Referrers can be faked, so treat these as maybe.

Named bots

Botas it names itselfTypeRequests
PetalBotSearch engines444
ClaudeBotAI crawlers271
ElevenlabsCrawlerOther named bots113
SERankingBacklinksBotSEO and marketing tools95
ApplebotSearch engines81
Amzn-SearchBotSearch engines77
meta-webindexerOther named bots71
RiverBotOther named bots55
OAI-SearchBotAI crawlers45
GPTBotAI crawlers32
bingbotSearch engines31
ShapBotOther named bots28
GooglebotSearch engines9
facebook.comOther named bots9
CensysInspectOther named bots8

What people opened

Pages opened by at least two different human visitors.

PageHuman visitors
/4

How people arrived

Referring siteHuman visitors
m.baidu.com1
www.google.com1

Where disguised bots operate from

Address blocks, not individual addresses. A heavily used block with many addresses suggests one operator rotating through them.

Address blockRequestsAddresses used
185.61.0.0/16521
47.79.0.0/162120
54.87.0.0/1681
100.54.0.0/1681
43.154.0.0/1677
123.6.0.0/1674
157.100.0.0/1666
27.115.0.0/1664

Day by day

DayHuman visitorsHuman pagesNamed botsrequestsDisguisedrequestsScannersrequestsUnclearrequestsAllrequestsBot share
Oct 230064580112399.2%
Oct 24226484154130699%
Oct 2500143320317898%
Oct 2611501097116998%
Oct 270011675197138999.7%
Oct 2811521401119698%
Oct 2900134244316598%
Oct 3000100150111699.1%
Oct 3133164302220496%
Nov 1111105884726197%
Nov 2002047284136199.7%
Nov 30011511210324099%
Nov 423554984319696%
Nov 5003010014198%
Nov 600915073177%

How this was measured

Every request in the server log was sorted by what it did, not only what it claimed to be. Bots that name themselves are counted as named. Anything claiming to be a browser had to act like one: open a page, fetch its images or icons, move at human speed, and come from outside the big cloud providers. These are estimates. A careful bot can pass the test, and a person with images blocked or a cached icon can fail it, so read the human figures as a good approximation, not an exact count. One person using two devices counts as two visitors. Google Analytics-style tools would show different numbers because most bots never run their script. Logs are kept for 15 days.

Built 2026-11-06 22:41 UTC from 15 log files.