Bot traffic: retire.realhotsprings.com

all sites · all domains · last 15 days

All sites · All Domains · Visit retire.realhotsprings.com

Who is really visiting retire.realhotsprings.com?

Between Oct 23 and Nov 6, retire.realhotsprings.com received 5,620 requests. About 97% came from automated software and about 0.5% look like real people.

That works out to about 11 human visitors, roughly fewer than 1 a day, who opened 12 pages between them. 1 of them read more than one page.

The biggest source is scanners hunting for security holes. They try the same list of common weak spots on every site they find.

The busiest day was Oct 26, with 3,068 requests, of which 6 came from people.

Bottom line: the hit counts on the All Domains worksheet are almost entirely bots. Use the human visitor figure here to judge this site's real audience.

97%of requests from bots
11human visitors (estimate)
12pages opened by people
5,620total requests, 15 days

Where the requests came from

People 0.5%Named bots 14%Disguised bots 2.8%Scanners 80%Unclear 2.7%

Requests per day

PeopleNamed botsDisguised botsScannersUnclear
01,0002,0003,0004,000Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

Human visitors per day

Same days, people only, on their own scale so they are visible.

01234Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

The breakdown

SourceRequestsΣ 5,620ShareData sentBlockedby the serverWhat this means
Break-in scanners4,19875%<1 MB540Probing for WordPress logins, password files and other common weak spots.
Search engines3626.4%2 MB0Crawlers that say who they are, such as Google, Bing, Apple and Amazon. Usually welcome: this is how people find the site.
Scanners posing as browsers3045.4%1 MB12Other requests from an address also caught probing for weak spots.
AI crawlers2163.8%<1 MB1AI companies gathering pages or answering a user's question, and saying so.
Other named bots1652.9%<1 MB2Any other software that identifies itself as a bot.
Unclear1522.7%<1 MB0Browser name, but fetched only an image or data file and no page. Could be either.
Disguised scrapers1472.6%2 MB1Claims to be a normal browser but only downloads pages, never the images or icons a real browser fetches, reads many pages without ever clicking a link, or runs from a cloud provider.
SEO and marketing tools370.7%<1 MB29Commercial tools that sell data about websites.
Likely people250.4%<1 MB0Opened a page and also fetched its images or icons, at a human pace, from a non-cloud address.
Scripts and tools110.2%<1 MB0Programs such as curl or Python, or anything with an unrecognizable name.
Possibly people20.0%<1 MB0Read 1 to 3 pages, arrived from a search engine or social link, no icons fetched. Referrers can be faked, so treat these as maybe.
No name given10.0%<1 MB0Requests that give no software name at all.

Named bots

Botas it names itselfTypeRequests
PetalBotSearch engines266
ClaudeBotAI crawlers140
RiverBotOther named bots86
OAI-SearchBotAI crawlers39
Amzn-SearchBotSearch engines38
GPTBotAI crawlers37
bingbotSearch engines33
ElevenlabsCrawlerOther named bots27
SemrushBotSEO and marketing tools26
GooglebotSearch engines22
CensysInspectOther named bots12
UmaiBotOther named bots9
BacklinksExtendedBotOther named bots7
SERankingBacklinksBotSEO and marketing tools6
meta-webindexerOther named bots4

What people opened

Pages opened by at least two different human visitors.

PageHuman visitors
/11

How people arrived

Referring siteHuman visitors
m.baidu.com1

Day by day

DayHuman visitorsHuman pagesNamed botsrequestsDisguisedrequestsScannersrequestsUnclearrequestsAllrequestsBot share
Oct 23006110138121099.5%
Oct 24114144339296%
Oct 2500482125396%
Oct 26333733,01933,06899.7%
Oct 2700375158120199.5%
Oct 2800511077614496%
Oct 2900271023093%
Oct 30334411066881%
Oct 3111628227695%
Nov 13312314435158398%
Nov 200699178526198%
Nov 30056211992630291%
Nov 41168151213524085%
Nov 500403213210570%
Nov 60016141302718786%

How this was measured

Every request in the server log was sorted by what it did, not only what it claimed to be. Bots that name themselves are counted as named. Anything claiming to be a browser had to act like one: open a page, fetch its images or icons, move at human speed, and come from outside the big cloud providers. These are estimates. A careful bot can pass the test, and a person with images blocked or a cached icon can fail it, so read the human figures as a good approximation, not an exact count. One person using two devices counts as two visitors. Google Analytics-style tools would show different numbers because most bots never run their script. Logs are kept for 15 days.

Built 2026-11-06 22:41 UTC from 15 log files.