Bot traffic: poems.dotepp.com

all sites · all domains · last 15 days

All sites · All Domains · Visit poems.dotepp.com

Who is really visiting poems.dotepp.com?

Between Oct 23 and Nov 6, poems.dotepp.com received 4,093 requests. About 99.4% came from automated software and about 0.0% look like real people.

That works out to about 1 human visitors, roughly fewer than 1 a day, who opened 1 pages between them. 0 of them read more than one page.

The biggest source is scanners hunting for security holes. They try the same list of common weak spots on every site they find.

The busiest day was Oct 26, with 3,051 requests, of which 0 came from people.

Bottom line: the hit counts on the All Domains worksheet are almost entirely bots. Use the human visitor figure here to judge this site's real audience.

99.4%of requests from bots
1human visitors (estimate)
1pages opened by people
4,093total requests, 15 days

Where the requests came from

People 0.0%Named bots 2.8%Disguised bots 0.9%Scanners 96%Unclear 0.6%

Requests per day

PeopleNamed botsDisguised botsScannersUnclear
01,0002,0003,0004,000Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

Human visitors per day

Same days, people only, on their own scale so they are visible.

01234Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

The breakdown

SourceRequestsΣ 4,093ShareData sentBlockedby the serverWhat this means
Break-in scanners3,80793%<1 MB518Probing for WordPress logins, password files and other common weak spots.
Scanners posing as browsers1132.8%<1 MB89Other requests from an address also caught probing for weak spots.
Search engines681.7%<1 MB65Crawlers that say who they are, such as Google, Bing, Apple and Amazon. Usually welcome: this is how people find the site.
Other named bots370.9%<1 MB37Any other software that identifies itself as a bot.
Disguised scrapers300.7%<1 MB30Claims to be a normal browser but only downloads pages, never the images or icons a real browser fetches, reads many pages without ever clicking a link, or runs from a cloud provider.
Unclear230.6%<1 MB23Browser name, but fetched only an image or data file and no page. Could be either.
AI crawlers80.2%<1 MB8AI companies gathering pages or answering a user's question, and saying so.
Scripts and tools40.1%<1 MB4Programs such as curl or Python, or anything with an unrecognizable name.
Likely people20.0%<1 MB2Opened a page and also fetched its images or icons, at a human pace, from a non-cloud address.
No name given10.0%<1 MB1Requests that give no software name at all.

Named bots

Botas it names itselfTypeRequests
PetalBotSearch engines59
Let's Encrypt validation serverOther named bots29
bingbotSearch engines6
GPTBotAI crawlers5
CensysInspectOther named bots3
GooglebotSearch engines3
wpbotOther named bots2
InternetMeasurementOther named bots2
AmazonbotAI crawlers2
modat.ioOther named bots1
OAI-SearchBotAI crawlers1

Day by day

DayHuman visitorsHuman pagesNamed botsrequestsDisguisedrequestsScannersrequestsUnclearrequestsAllrequestsBot share
Oct 2300524225196%
Oct 24001012113397%
Oct 2500536317299%
Oct 2600453,04023,05199.9%
Oct 2700622123194%
Oct 28001276348695%
Oct 2900714215198%
Oct 3000612112997%
Oct 31005143049100.0%
Nov 100132280129699.7%
Nov 200160021889%
Nov 30043143215299%
Nov 4111312113892%
Nov 5006421031100.0%
Nov 6001299310597%

How this was measured

Every request in the server log was sorted by what it did, not only what it claimed to be. Bots that name themselves are counted as named. Anything claiming to be a browser had to act like one: open a page, fetch its images or icons, move at human speed, and come from outside the big cloud providers. These are estimates. A careful bot can pass the test, and a person with images blocked or a cached icon can fail it, so read the human figures as a good approximation, not an exact count. One person using two devices counts as two visitors. Google Analytics-style tools would show different numbers because most bots never run their script. Logs are kept for 15 days.

Built 2026-11-06 22:41 UTC from 15 log files.