Bot traffic: cargosolar.com

all sites · all domains · last 15 days

All sites · All Domains · Visit cargosolar.com

Who is really visiting cargosolar.com?

Between Oct 23 and Nov 6, cargosolar.com received 41,983 requests. About 99% came from automated software and about 0.4% look like real people.

That works out to about 66 human visitors, roughly 4 a day, who opened 115 pages between them. 29 of them read more than one page.

The biggest source is scanners hunting for security holes. They try the same list of common weak spots on every site they find.

Bottom line: the hit counts on the All Domains worksheet are almost entirely bots. Use the human visitor figure here to judge this site's real audience.

99%of requests from bots
66human visitors (estimate)
115pages opened by people
41,983total requests, 15 days

Where the requests came from

People 0.4%Named bots 11%Disguised bots 9.6%Scanners 78%Unclear 0.6%

Requests per day

PeopleNamed botsDisguised botsScannersUnclear
01,5003,0004,5006,000Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

Human visitors per day

Same days, people only, on their own scale so they are visible.

036912Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

The breakdown

SourceRequestsΣ 41,983ShareData sentBlockedby the serverWhat this means
Break-in scanners27,54666%31 MB13,234Probing for WordPress logins, password files and other common weak spots.
Scanners posing as browsers5,22412%27 MB56Other requests from an address also caught probing for weak spots.
Disguised scrapers3,2127.7%42 MB1Claims to be a normal browser but only downloads pages, never the images or icons a real browser fetches, reads many pages without ever clicking a link, or runs from a cloud provider.
Other named bots1,6423.9%16 MB25Any other software that identifies itself as a bot.
Search engines1,6243.9%8 MB9Crawlers that say who they are, such as Google, Bing, Apple and Amazon. Usually welcome: this is how people find the site.
AI crawlers1,3263.2%2 MB72AI companies gathering pages or answering a user's question, and saying so.
Scripts and tools4941.2%3 MB1Programs such as curl or Python, or anything with an unrecognizable name.
No name given3190.8%2 MB5Requests that give no software name at all.
Unclear2470.6%<1 MB0Browser name, but fetched only an image or data file and no page. Could be either.
SEO and marketing tools1830.4%<1 MB68Commercial tools that sell data about websites.
Likely people1200.3%1 MB0Opened a page and also fetched its images or icons, at a human pace, from a non-cloud address.
Possibly people430.1%<1 MB0Read 1 to 3 pages, arrived from a search engine or social link, no icons fetched. Referrers can be faked, so treat these as maybe.
App link sweepers30.0%<1 MB0Touches only login, app or embed links and no actual content.

Named bots

Botas it names itselfTypeRequests
PetalBotSearch engines618
GooglebotSearch engines331
OAI-SearchBotAI crawlers218
bingbotSearch engines181
facebook.comOther named bots177
QlyzeBotOther named bots152
ClaudeBotAI crawlers144
ElevenlabsCrawlerOther named bots120
Amzn-SearchBotSearch engines113
GPTBotAI crawlers112
BaiduspiderSearch engines88
ApplebotSearch engines87
DuckAssistBotOther named bots83
meta-webindexerOther named bots81
CCBotAI crawlers81

What people opened

Pages opened by at least two different human visitors.

PageHuman visitors
/37
/social/5
/news/2026-05-07-ecocapsule-off-grid-egg-pod-solar-wind-rain3
/news/2026-05-03-shelly-solar-tiny-house-off-grid-build-specs-viability3
/diyconex/2
/news/2026-05-07-shipping-container-homes-off-grid-solar-build-guide.html2
/news/2
/sitemap.html2
/midea/2
/about/2
/news/2026-05-16-shipping-container-homes-costs-specs-build-viability.html2

How people arrived

Referring siteHuman visitors
m.baidu.com19
www.google.com6
www.bing.com3
duckduckgo.com3
facebook.com1

Where disguised bots operate from

Address blocks, not individual addresses. A heavily used block with many addresses suggests one operator rotating through them.

Address blockRequestsAddresses used
192.42.0.0/1629056
66.249.0.0/1616115
104.164.0.0/16695
185.220.0.0/166330
45.138.0.0/16523
43.130.0.0/164325
47.82.0.0/163939
5.102.0.0/16353

Day by day

DayHuman visitorsHuman pagesNamed botsrequestsDisguisedrequestsScannersrequestsUnclearrequestsAllrequestsBot share
Oct 236103173061,928172,58599%
Oct 24571513311,032121,53699%
Oct 25222052181,867172,31199.1%
Oct 2612153602554,431175,08799.2%
Oct 275124453611,442152,27799%
Oct 28442592122,825213,32499.2%
Oct 29341432571,089141,50999%
Oct 30242875482,313223,17599.1%
Oct 31572352262,217182,70599.0%
Nov 1353913112,741173,46699.3%
Nov 2367002214,959125,90099.7%
Nov 3586352122,986103,85399.5%
Nov 47102041861,490291,92698%
Nov 5718325244871151,47698%
Nov 6231181405791185398%

How this was measured

Every request in the server log was sorted by what it did, not only what it claimed to be. Bots that name themselves are counted as named. Anything claiming to be a browser had to act like one: open a page, fetch its images or icons, move at human speed, and come from outside the big cloud providers. These are estimates. A careful bot can pass the test, and a person with images blocked or a cached icon can fail it, so read the human figures as a good approximation, not an exact count. One person using two devices counts as two visitors. Google Analytics-style tools would show different numbers because most bots never run their script. Logs are kept for 15 days.

Built 2026-11-06 22:42 UTC from 15 log files.